The “data” underpinning the whole thing is BS. Just more lies. From that article:weimy froob wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 8:35 ammlhouse wrote: ↑Sun May 15, 2022 10:51 pm I just finished watching the documentary.
The claims are pretty compelling if they actually have the evidence they claim they have: namely, video of these individual "mules" that are linked by geo tracking data and video data at the drop boxes placing multiple ballots into multiple drop boxes. Even some of the anecdotal video is pretty suggestive- there is a woman who breezes up to the drop box wearing gloves, turns around and walks to a trash can she did not even look at on her approach and throws the gloves into the trash or the people dropping off ballots in these drop boxes and then taking a pic of the box (to prove they dropped off the ballots so they can be paid). Who wears gloves just to make a drop at a ballot box? Who takes pictures of a ballot drop box?
But the weakness of the presentation is they do not show this. They show the clips, but they never showed video of a person going to more than one drop box. They claim in the 400 million minutes of video they have this but it is never shown in the released documentary.
Because of this, there is not sufficient evidence presented in the released documentary to make a real case. I believe there was a huge amount of ballot harvesting in the 2020 election with the millions of unsolicited ballots mailed out to voters, many of whom no longer existed at the address they had on the voter rolls (who fights keeping accurate voting rolls?). But, if I had to make a jury vote of "guilty or not guilty", unless they presented information not presented in the released documentary I would vote "not guilty" because they did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt their case.
“ This is not the type of analysis you can use ACLED data for, and it is highly unlikely that these conclusions have any basis in fact," said Sam Jones, senior communications manager at ACLED.
"This is not what we do - we do not track device IDs," Roudabeh Kishi, the director of research and innovation at ACLED, told NPR in an interview.
ACLED does track violent incidents around the world, including riots, as well as peaceful protests. Their data do not include specific locations inside a city - such as neighborhoods or city blocks - where protests took place. ACLED does not track the time of day of those incidents or generally note individual participants, except for high-profile leaders.”
So much for tracking “ballot box stuffers”.
™ ARE TRAITORS! 
