Yeah and the voters STILL prefer him to the republican alternative!
Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
John Fetterman...
Moderator: Steven Seagal
- Riley91
- Posts: 12722
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:27 am
Re: John Fetterman...
BFF of RubeChick
- Hornets
- Posts: 65263
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:46 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
I bet if they voted today things would be different...guy is almost a vegetable!!
BTW....you hittin the reefer tonight??!!
***THE REAL HORNETS HAS THOUSANDS OF POSTS and joined RC October 4, 2017!***

- Riley91
- Posts: 12722
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2020 2:27 am
Re: John Fetterman...
Just a little bit.. don't want to end up like Fetterman! I'm sure I'd have to smoke a LOT of dope to have as many strokes as that guy has though!!
BFF of RubeChick
- Hornets
- Posts: 65263
- Joined: Wed Oct 04, 2017 8:46 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
***THE REAL HORNETS HAS THOUSANDS OF POSTS and joined RC October 4, 2017!***

-
PurpleFloyd
- Posts: 32429
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:58 am
Re: John Fetterman...
I do. I don’t vote for Democrats or Republicans because they have decided they can continually produce terrible candidates and still get votes because people are overall like lemmings that will vote for a letter no matter who it is.mlhouse wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:24 amWell, the WE is the voters of the United States. You would think they would want to use their vote more wisely. But they vote for people like John Fetterman who was totally impaired.
- Butch Bradford
- Posts: 26056
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:03 pm
- Location: The Golden Age of America
Re: John Fetterman...
So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:32 pmClearly you think this is a binary party issue. So why would it have mattered? In your mind you can only be a Dem or a Con, and all Dems vote Dem and all Cons vote Con, right? Nominate a non-sleezy grifter and you'll likely have better luck.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:20 pmOh your party won by hiding Fetterman from debates and having his doctor provide a general health report that hid his obvious mental and physical disabilities.stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:05 pm Kind of hilarious Republicans couldn't find a better candidate than Dr Conman to run against John The Vegetable. How do you lose that race?![]()
You see, the left didn't want to expose Fetterman for who he really is.....
Kind of like when Biden's handlers had him hide in his basement while campaigning for POTUS.
Sad, really.
That is all we need to know about you and your party.
Godspeed.
My shit don’t stink.
Spoiler:
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
Bad candidates for sure.PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 6:54 pmI do. I don’t vote for Democrats or Republicans because they have decided they can continually produce terrible candidates and still get votes because people are overall like lemmings that will vote for a letter no matter who it is.
-
Mill City Froob
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:37 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 amSo you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:32 pmClearly you think this is a binary party issue. So why would it have mattered? In your mind you can only be a Dem or a Con, and all Dems vote Dem and all Cons vote Con, right? Nominate a non-sleezy grifter and you'll likely have better luck.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:20 pm
Oh your party won by hiding Fetterman from debates and having his doctor provide a general health report that hid his obvious mental and physical disabilities.
You see, the left didn't want to expose Fetterman for who he really is.....
Kind of like when Biden's handlers had him hide in his basement while campaigning for POTUS.
Sad, really.
That is all we need to know about you and your party.
Godspeed.
- Butch Bradford
- Posts: 26056
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:03 pm
- Location: The Golden Age of America
Re: John Fetterman...
Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 amI don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 amSo you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:32 pm
Clearly you think this is a binary party issue. So why would it have mattered? In your mind you can only be a Dem or a Con, and all Dems vote Dem and all Cons vote Con, right? Nominate a non-sleezy grifter and you'll likely have better luck.
That is all we need to know about you and your party.
Godspeed.![]()
One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.
And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.
Godspeed,.
My shit don’t stink.
Spoiler:
-
Mill City Froob
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:37 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
You didn't know about his condition during the race? Were you not paying attention?Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 amAgain, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 amI don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am
So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.
That is all we need to know about you and your party.
Godspeed.![]()
One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.
And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.
Godspeed,.
-
PurpleFloyd
- Posts: 32429
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:58 am
Re: John Fetterman...
stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 amI don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 amSo you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:32 pm
Clearly you think this is a binary party issue. So why would it have mattered? In your mind you can only be a Dem or a Con, and all Dems vote Dem and all Cons vote Con, right? Nominate a non-sleezy grifter and you'll likely have better luck.
That is all we need to know about you and your party.
Godspeed.![]()
This post is spot on.
If the republicans are that inept as a party that they can’t produce candidates good enough to beat Fetterman and Biden then they should take a long look in the mirror and replace their incompetent leadership with people who can.
-
Mill City Froob
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:37 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
Bingo.PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:24 amstinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 amI don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am
So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.
That is all we need to know about you and your party.
Godspeed.![]()
This post is spot on.
If the republicans are that inept as a party that they can’t produce candidates good enough to beat Fetterman and Biden then they should take a long look in the mirror and replace their incompetent leadership with people who can.
- Butch Bradford
- Posts: 26056
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:03 pm
- Location: The Golden Age of America
Re: John Fetterman...
I didn't say that, you did, giggle tits.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:23 amYou didn't know about his condition during the race? Were you not paying attention?Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 amAgain, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am
I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.![]()
One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.
And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.
Godspeed.![]()
Now piss off, you bore me, thinktank.
My shit don’t stink.
Spoiler:
-
Mill City Froob
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:37 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
I appreciate you admitting defeat. Next time don't engage if you plan on bringing such weak nonsense. Fetterman looks more competent than your performance here, Butch.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:27 amI didn't say that, you did, giggle tits.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:23 amYou didn't know about his condition during the race? Were you not paying attention?Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 am
Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.
One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.
And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.
Godspeed.![]()
Now piss off, you bore me, thinktank.
- Butch Bradford
- Posts: 26056
- Joined: Sat Jun 08, 2019 1:03 pm
- Location: The Golden Age of America
Re: John Fetterman...
You engaged me, thinktank with your "weak nonsense."stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:31 amI appreciate you admitting defeat. Next time don't engage if you plan on bringing such weak nonsense. Fetterman looks more competent than your performance here, Butch.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:27 amI didn't say that, you did, giggle tits.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:23 am
You didn't know about his condition during the race? Were you not paying attention?![]()
Now piss off, you bore me, thinktank.
But you keep believing that you won an internet debate because I am sure that makes you feel so much better about yourself.
Oh and keep up the good fight protecting your party, comrade.
They need all the help they can get!
My shit don’t stink.
Spoiler:
-
Mill City Froob
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:37 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
You're very upset, Butch. I get it that it's very upsetting you couldn't find someone competent enough to beat The Vegetable.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:40 amYou engaged me, thinktank with your "weak nonsense."stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:31 amI appreciate you admitting defeat. Next time don't engage if you plan on bringing such weak nonsense. Fetterman looks more competent than your performance here, Butch.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:27 am
I didn't say that, you did, giggle tits.
Now piss off, you bore me, thinktank.
But you keep believing that you won an internet debate because I am sure that makes you feel so much better about yourself.
Oh and keep up the good fight protecting your party, comrade.
They need all the help they can get!
Reminder, you engaged me. Then admitted defeat, like Dr Conman.
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:20 pmOh your party won by hiding Fetterman from debates and having his doctor provide a general health report that hid his obvious mental and physical disabilities.stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:05 pm Kind of hilarious Republicans couldn't find a better candidate than Dr Conman to run against John The Vegetable. How do you lose that race?![]()
You see, the left didn't want to expose Fetterman for who he really is.....
Kind of like when Biden's handlers had him hide in his basement while campaigning for POTUS.
Sad, really.
- Night Train
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - October 2018***
- Posts: 40668
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Corner of 14th and Oak
Re: John Fetterman...
Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. - EcclesiastICS 10:2
Minnesota - Mired in Mediocrity
Minnesota - Mired in Mediocrity
- Jimi_Thing
- Posts: 24568
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:53 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
How is that putting one man’s health over country?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
- ForCaleb
- Posts: 91847
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 3:29 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
JFCJimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pmHow is that putting one man’s health over country?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
- Ask Not
- ***Official 2018 Froob Bracket Winner and MNRC HOF Member***
- Posts: 51927
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:28 pm
- Location: East Metro or Montgomery Legion
Re: John Fetterman...
You watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
-
PurpleFloyd
- Posts: 32429
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:58 am
Re: John Fetterman...
Oh shit! Didn’t he get your permission before he did? That’s a pretty serious breachAsk Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pmYou watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
-
Mill City Froob
- Posts: 4227
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2020 7:37 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
Wouldn't it be the other way around? Putting the country over his health?Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pmHow is that putting one man’s health over country?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
- Jimi_Thing
- Posts: 24568
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2017 6:53 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
Yeah. It doesn’t make sense.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:25 pmWouldn't it be the other way around? Putting the country over his health?Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pmHow is that putting one man’s health over country?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
- ForCaleb
- Posts: 91847
- Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2017 3:29 pm
Re: John Fetterman...
OMFGJimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:27 pmYeah. It doesn’t make sense.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:25 pmWouldn't it be the other way around? Putting the country over his health?
- Ask Not
- ***Official 2018 Froob Bracket Winner and MNRC HOF Member***
- Posts: 51927
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:28 pm
- Location: East Metro or Montgomery Legion
Re: John Fetterman...
Get permission?PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:21 pmOh shit! Didn’t he get your permission before he did? That’s a pretty serious breachAsk Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pmYou watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
I'm wondering if he watched the debates for all 30+ senate races? Did he watch the debates for all the house seats, too? That's a strong interest in political conversation.
-
PurpleFloyd
- Posts: 32429
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:58 am
Re: John Fetterman...
Why does he have to watch all 30? It’s very possible to watch one or two that have interest without committing to watch every race.Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:50 pmGet permission?PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:21 pmOh shit! Didn’t he get your permission before he did? That’s a pretty serious breach![]()
I'm wondering if he watched the debates for all 30+ senate races? Did he watch the debates for all the house seats, too? That's a strong interest in political conversation.
I watched some of it myself because it was broadcast nationally and it was a train wreck with two very flawed candidates. But I didn’t watch all 30 and I suspect most didn’t because I would guess most were not broadcast nationally.
- Ask Not
- ***Official 2018 Froob Bracket Winner and MNRC HOF Member***
- Posts: 51927
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:28 pm
- Location: East Metro or Montgomery Legion
Re: John Fetterman...
He didn't need my permission nor did I suggest he must watch all of them. Those were your odd pivots.PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 9:32 pmWhy does he have to watch all 30? It’s very possible to watch one or two that have interest without committing to watch every race.Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:50 pmGet permission?PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:21 pm
Oh shit! Didn’t he get your permission before he did? That’s a pretty serious breach![]()
I'm wondering if he watched the debates for all 30+ senate races? Did he watch the debates for all the house seats, too? That's a strong interest in political conversation.
I watched some of it myself because it was broadcast nationally and it was a train wreck with two very flawed candidates. But I didn’t watch all 30 and I suspect most didn’t because I would guess most were not broadcast nationally.
I was curious if he did watch them all and curious why he'd watch that one. There's no need to make it into a thing.
- Night Train
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - October 2018***
- Posts: 40668
- Joined: Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:56 pm
- Location: Corner of 14th and Oak
Re: John Fetterman...
It was a national story with national coverage. His debate performance was a hot topic for a day or two. Did you see any of that? What did you think?Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pmYou watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
I don't own a dog, but I don't need to own a dog to know animal abuse when I see it.
The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left. - EcclesiastICS 10:2
Minnesota - Mired in Mediocrity
Minnesota - Mired in Mediocrity
-
PurpleFloyd
- Posts: 32429
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:58 am
Re: John Fetterman...
My odd pivots? You are the one who brought all of that into the conversation. What an odd attempt at a deflectionAsk Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:51 pmHe didn't need my permission nor did I suggest he must watch all of them. Those were your odd pivots.PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 9:32 pmWhy does he have to watch all 30? It’s very possible to watch one or two that have interest without committing to watch every race.
I watched some of it myself because it was broadcast nationally and it was a train wreck with two very flawed candidates. But I didn’t watch all 30 and I suspect most didn’t because I would guess most were not broadcast nationally.
I was curious if he did watch them all and curious why he'd watch that one. There's no need to make it into a thing.
- Ask Not
- ***Official 2018 Froob Bracket Winner and MNRC HOF Member***
- Posts: 51927
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 3:28 pm
- Location: East Metro or Montgomery Legion
Re: John Fetterman...
I didn't watch a moment of it. I didn't watch any of the SOTU either. I'm not the citizen I once was.Night Train wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 6:10 amIt was a national story with national coverage. His debate performance was a hot topic for a day or two. Did you see any of that? What did you think?Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pmYou watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
I don't own a dog, but I don't need to own a dog to know animal abuse when I see it.
Side note: I hope you don't think you needed to get my permission before taking in that gripping television or that you are required to watch all the debates across the country. You could watch nothing but reruns of Blossom and Silver Spoons for all I care.







