Crazy to believe he has never made one.OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:45 amNo I wouldn't expect him to be. At the same time, Conley has never made an all-star game and I 100% would have maxed him over these years.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:16 amHe won't be an all star in the west. If he is, he'd be worth it.OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:02 am
Probably not but he has room to grow into it. And he's at least a borderline all star player
Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Moderator: Sylvester Stallone
- Seenin
- Posts: 998
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2017 8:17 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Steam:Seenin
Xbox:Seenin
Discord:SirFucksworth
Xbox:Seenin
Discord:SirFucksworth
-
thinktank
- Posts: 29459
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:43 am
-
RubeTube
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - November 2018***
- Posts: 52158
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:10 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I would have ZERO problem with any of this.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:34 amCanis Hoops proposed a 3 team trade that had us sending out Teague and Okogie, w/ maybe having to include KBD if Russell demands a max deal.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:27 am What is everyone's assumption, that Wiggins has to be moved if there is a path to Russell? Or are they thinking Teague, Dieng and other?
“We are nonviolent with people who are nonviolent with us.”
— Malcolm X
The Puppet Master
FUCK TRUMP!
FUCK ICE!
— Malcolm X
The Puppet Master
FUCK TRUMP!
FUCK ICE!
- Moses Scurry
- Posts: 18777
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Does any team have 3 max contracts under the new rules? GS doesn't as Curry was on the last CBA deal if I recall thus he was way cheaper.
-
Thrillkill
- Posts: 9760
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:26 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
No but there's some with 2 and another like 20 right?Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:10 pm Does any team have 3 max contracts under the new rules? GS doesn't as Curry was on the last CBA deal if I recall thus he was way cheaper.
And seriously can anyone really see anything to get Russell other than we move Wigs for the space? I don't. Give away Wigs for nothing and sign Russell with that money and that's a good trade. If you have to pay to dump Wigs then no.
-
jodaman01
- #1 Tom Thibodeau Fan
- Posts: 8870
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:06 am
-
Thrillkill
- Posts: 9760
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:26 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
He'd have to take a significant haircut to go there.jodaman01 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:27 pm https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/dangelo-ru ... 83866.html
Destiny if ever there was.
-
Oriole81
- Posts: 38110
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
D'Angelo Russell was traded away from the Los Angeles Lakers soon after he exposed Nick Young's cheating ways while he was with Iggy Azalea. He has since matured nicely on the Brooklyn Nets,jodaman01 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:27 pm https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/dangelo-ru ... 83866.html
Destiny if ever there was.
I know this is off main topic, but I really hate reading about Russell was the one that needed to mature. I understand the narrative about snitching, but Nick Young is the actual bad guy here and he's the one that really needs to be maturing. Every time a story is written like this, it just lets Nick off the hook for what he did, which is just sad.
2025 Froob NBA Draft
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
- somuchyummy
- Posts: 37470
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 9:14 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
i've thought the same thing. so russell is penalized for calling young a prick when, in fact, young is a prick?Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:34 pmD'Angelo Russell was traded away from the Los Angeles Lakers soon after he exposed Nick Young's cheating ways while he was with Iggy Azalea. He has since matured nicely on the Brooklyn Nets,jodaman01 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:27 pm https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/dangelo-ru ... 83866.html
Destiny if ever there was.
I know this is off main topic, but I really hate reading about Russell was the one that needed to mature. I understand the narrative about snitching, but Nick Young is the actual bad guy here and he's the one that really needs to be maturing. Every time a story is written like this, it just lets Nick off the hook for what he did, which is just sad.
All Time Draft 2025
PG - Kidd, Iverson, D Johnson
SG - Reggie, Hill, Richmond
SF - Kawhi, Hawkins, Ellis
PF - Hakeem, Cowens, Perkins
C - Wilt, Alonzo, Thurmond
There is little difference between the memory of a real event and the memory of a dream.
PG - Kidd, Iverson, D Johnson
SG - Reggie, Hill, Richmond
SF - Kawhi, Hawkins, Ellis
PF - Hakeem, Cowens, Perkins
C - Wilt, Alonzo, Thurmond
There is little difference between the memory of a real event and the memory of a dream.
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 7386
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I REALLY don't want to deal OK. We need to keep players like him as bench players and under cost control for a few years.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:34 amCanis Hoops proposed a 3 team trade that had us sending out Teague and Okogie, w/ maybe having to include KBD if Russell demands a max deal.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:27 am What is everyone's assumption, that Wiggins has to be moved if there is a path to Russell? Or are they thinking Teague, Dieng and other?
Personally not real interested in Russell, but then again, only watched him play once in two years. So......
If he can take KAT to another level, then I'm all in.
-
Dubs
- Posts: 290
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 10:37 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Tobias HarrisThe Replacements wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:41 am If the Nets don't get Kyrie Irving, they'll re-sign Russell and there's nothing we can do about it. I hope there's a plan B to Russell.
-
Thrillkill
- Posts: 9760
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:26 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Russell is good. If you can work out deals where you essentially trade Wigs for him then cool. Want no part of moving Okogie and another piece. Okogie is going to be the next Jimmy Butler not Culver. Well, let's hope it's Culver too.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:46 pmI REALLY don't want to deal OK. We need to keep players like him as bench players and under cost control for a few years.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:34 amCanis Hoops proposed a 3 team trade that had us sending out Teague and Okogie, w/ maybe having to include KBD if Russell demands a max deal.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:27 am What is everyone's assumption, that Wiggins has to be moved if there is a path to Russell? Or are they thinking Teague, Dieng and other?
Personally not real interested in Russell, but then again, only watched him play once in two years. So......
If he can take KAT to another level, then I'm all in.
-
Thrillkill
- Posts: 9760
- Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:26 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Hel no. And if it's no Kyrie and Russell stays I'll bet a ton that's where Harris ends up.Dubs wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:59 pmTobias HarrisThe Replacements wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 10:41 am If the Nets don't get Kyrie Irving, they'll re-sign Russell and there's nothing we can do about it. I hope there's a plan B to Russell.
-
Oriole81
- Posts: 38110
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
just playing devil's advocate here, but we would still have Culver, Nowell, Reynolds as wings all on cheap rookie deals plus having Cov on his great veteran contract, so we would still have multiple options with good team control.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:46 pmI REALLY don't want to deal OK. We need to keep players like him as bench players and under cost control for a few years.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:34 amCanis Hoops proposed a 3 team trade that had us sending out Teague and Okogie, w/ maybe having to include KBD if Russell demands a max deal.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 11:27 am What is everyone's assumption, that Wiggins has to be moved if there is a path to Russell? Or are they thinking Teague, Dieng and other?
Personally not real interested in Russell, but then again, only watched him play once in two years. So......
If he can take KAT to another level, then I'm all in.
trading from position of strength.
2025 Froob NBA Draft
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
-
OliverMiller
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 4:54 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I'd add a future first to that deal if necessary.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:02 pmjust playing devil's advocate here, but we would still have Culver, Nowell, Reynolds as wings all on cheap rookie deals plus having Cov on his great veteran contract, so we would still have multiple options with good team control.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:46 pmI REALLY don't want to deal OK. We need to keep players like him as bench players and under cost control for a few years.
Personally not real interested in Russell, but then again, only watched him play once in two years. So......
If he can take KAT to another level, then I'm all in.
trading from position of strength.
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 7386
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Young is a prick and he paid for it with the breakup. However, what DLo did was dirty. If another man is telling you about his affairs and you don't agree, either tell him to STFU or leave.somuchyummy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:43 pmi've thought the same thing. so russell is penalized for calling young a prick when, in fact, young is a prick?Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:34 pmD'Angelo Russell was traded away from the Los Angeles Lakers soon after he exposed Nick Young's cheating ways while he was with Iggy Azalea. He has since matured nicely on the Brooklyn Nets,jodaman01 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:27 pm https://www.hotnewhiphop.com/dangelo-ru ... 83866.html
Destiny if ever there was.
I know this is off main topic, but I really hate reading about Russell was the one that needed to mature. I understand the narrative about snitching, but Nick Young is the actual bad guy here and he's the one that really needs to be maturing. Every time a story is written like this, it just lets Nick off the hook for what he did, which is just sad.
The reason is not just the snitching, it's the WAY he set him up. He ASKED him to go into DETAIL about the affair (for lack of..) as if he was planning to show it to Iggy. He knew what he was doing was WRONG, and violates the "bro code" but it was even dumber to POST it online.
Players don't TRUST a person like that, and especially not one that's in the NBA brotherhood. Swaggy was engaged at the time, and while it was unmoral and dickish, he didn't do anything wrong. Russell deliberately set a man up for his own pleasure, and caused Iggy embarrassment and unneeded pain. He should have let her find out he was a prick on her own. It was really non of his business.
So he should take heat for it. Period.
-
Oriole81
- Posts: 38110
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
fair enough, I admit I don't know all the details.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:20 pmYoung is a prick and he paid for it with the breakup. However, what DLo did was dirty. If another man is telling you about his affairs and you don't agree, either tell him to STFU or leave.somuchyummy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:43 pmi've thought the same thing. so russell is penalized for calling young a prick when, in fact, young is a prick?Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:34 pm
D'Angelo Russell was traded away from the Los Angeles Lakers soon after he exposed Nick Young's cheating ways while he was with Iggy Azalea. He has since matured nicely on the Brooklyn Nets,
I know this is off main topic, but I really hate reading about Russell was the one that needed to mature. I understand the narrative about snitching, but Nick Young is the actual bad guy here and he's the one that really needs to be maturing. Every time a story is written like this, it just lets Nick off the hook for what he did, which is just sad.
The reason is not just the snitching, it's the WAY he set him up. He ASKED him to go into DETAIL about the affair (for lack of..) as if he was planning to show it to Iggy. He knew what he was doing was WRONG, and violates the "bro code" but it was even dumber to POST it online.
Players don't TRUST a person like that, and especially not one that's in the NBA brotherhood. Swaggy was engaged at the time, and while it was unmoral and dickish, he didn't do anything wrong. Russell deliberately set a man up for his own pleasure, and caused Iggy embarrassment and unneeded pain. He should have let her find out he was a prick on her own. It was really non of his business.
So he should take heat for it. Period.
but Young did do something wrong, he cheated on his fiancee. that's wrong.
You can make your case against Russell while still not simultaneously absolving Young.
2025 Froob NBA Draft
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
- SHAFA
- Posts: 15128
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 10:25 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I can get that too, but you know, don’t brag about cheating on your girlfriend/fiancée then. You’re an idiot for doing it in the first place, and a bigger idiot for bragging about it. Light the asshole up.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:20 pmYoung is a prick and he paid for it with the breakup. However, what DLo did was dirty. If another man is telling you about his affairs and you don't agree, either tell him to STFU or leave.somuchyummy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:43 pmi've thought the same thing. so russell is penalized for calling young a prick when, in fact, young is a prick?Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:34 pm
D'Angelo Russell was traded away from the Los Angeles Lakers soon after he exposed Nick Young's cheating ways while he was with Iggy Azalea. He has since matured nicely on the Brooklyn Nets,
I know this is off main topic, but I really hate reading about Russell was the one that needed to mature. I understand the narrative about snitching, but Nick Young is the actual bad guy here and he's the one that really needs to be maturing. Every time a story is written like this, it just lets Nick off the hook for what he did, which is just sad.
The reason is not just the snitching, it's the WAY he set him up. He ASKED him to go into DETAIL about the affair (for lack of..) as if he was planning to show it to Iggy. He knew what he was doing was WRONG, and violates the "bro code" but it was even dumber to POST it online.
Players don't TRUST a person like that, and especially not one that's in the NBA brotherhood. Swaggy was engaged at the time, and while it was unmoral and dickish, he didn't do anything wrong. Russell deliberately set a man up for his own pleasure, and caused Iggy embarrassment and unneeded pain. He should have let her find out he was a prick on her own. It was really non of his business.
So he should take heat for it. Period.
-
Oriole81
- Posts: 38110
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I don't even think you'd have to. If we' use the Crabbe trade as precedent...OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:06 pmI'd add a future first to that deal if necessary.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:02 pmjust playing devil's advocate here, but we would still have Culver, Nowell, Reynolds as wings all on cheap rookie deals plus having Cov on his great veteran contract, so we would still have multiple options with good team control.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:46 pm
I REALLY don't want to deal OK. We need to keep players like him as bench players and under cost control for a few years.
Personally not real interested in Russell, but then again, only watched him play once in two years. So......
If he can take KAT to another level, then I'm all in.
trading from position of strength.
Teague and Crabbe are a wash
Okogie and this year's #17 are a wash.
Yeah, Atl gets another first but it's lottery protected until 2022 so it's never going to be an elite pick and they had to send out a good player in Taurean Prince plus a 2021 2nd rd pick to the Nets, so I call that a wash too.
Teague and Okogie on their own should work in my opinion.
2025 Froob NBA Draft
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
-
RubeTube
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - November 2018***
- Posts: 52158
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:10 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
We are getting DLo a year too late.
We would of heard the whole story of Towns not only being abused by Jimmy but his GF getting "Buckets" of jizz shot on her.
We would of heard the whole story of Towns not only being abused by Jimmy but his GF getting "Buckets" of jizz shot on her.
“We are nonviolent with people who are nonviolent with us.”
— Malcolm X
The Puppet Master
FUCK TRUMP!
FUCK ICE!
— Malcolm X
The Puppet Master
FUCK TRUMP!
FUCK ICE!
- Moses Scurry
- Posts: 18777
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I'm thinking the road to DLo is Culver. Culver, Teague, Dieng for DLo sign and trade. Brooklyn signs Kyrie, maybe buckets, they need young cheap talent after that.
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 7386
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
True, and also immoral, but Iggy should have known he is/was like that. It's well known that NBA players sleep around.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:37 pmfair enough, I admit I don't know all the details.Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 1:20 pmYoung is a prick and he paid for it with the breakup. However, what DLo did was dirty. If another man is telling you about his affairs and you don't agree, either tell him to STFU or leave.somuchyummy wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 12:43 pm
i've thought the same thing. so russell is penalized for calling young a prick when, in fact, young is a prick?
The reason is not just the snitching, it's the WAY he set him up. He ASKED him to go into DETAIL about the affair (for lack of..) as if he was planning to show it to Iggy. He knew what he was doing was WRONG, and violates the "bro code" but it was even dumber to POST it online.
Players don't TRUST a person like that, and especially not one that's in the NBA brotherhood. Swaggy was engaged at the time, and while it was unmoral and dickish, he didn't do anything wrong. Russell deliberately set a man up for his own pleasure, and caused Iggy embarrassment and unneeded pain. He should have let her find out he was a prick on her own. It was really non of his business.
So he should take heat for it. Period.
but Young did do something wrong, he cheated on his fiancee. that's wrong.
You can make your case against Russell while still not simultaneously absolving Young.
And as I stated, wrong doesn't mean illegal.
If you ever watch the video, you will have more distain for Russell. IMO.
-
OliverMiller
- Posts: 2246
- Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2018 4:54 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I'd prefer to move Okogie and a pick but if it came to it I'd move Culver.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:01 pm I'm thinking the road to DLo is Culver. Culver, Teague, Dieng for DLo sign and trade. Brooklyn signs Kyrie, maybe buckets, they need young cheap talent after that.
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
-
Oriole81
- Posts: 38110
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Brooklyn isn't getting the players back in this trade because their cap space is exhausted by the two FA signings. They would be going to the 3rd team, which can just absorb the outgoing MN players into their cap space. The Canis example used the Knicks, presuming they would get shut out in FA.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:01 pm I'm thinking the road to DLo is Culver. Culver, Teague, Dieng for DLo sign and trade. Brooklyn signs Kyrie, maybe buckets, they need young cheap talent after that.
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
Since they would need to get to salary floor anyway at this point, they're taking Teague without any long term salary commitment (like Phi did with Redick as a free agent), so they only need very little incentive for it to make sense for them. That's why you could get by with Okogie and not have to give up Culver.
Brooklyn isn't expected to get anything of value in return for Russell since the cap space is what they want, so we don't have to actually match on the court talent to Russell. We only have to send out enough for an unrelated team to take on Teague for 1 year.
2025 Froob NBA Draft
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
The Nets will not take salary back in any sign and trade.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:13 pmBrooklyn isn't getting the players back in this trade because their cap space is exhausted by the two FA signings. They would be going to the 3rd team, which can just absorb the outgoing MN players into their cap space. The Canis example used the Knicks, presuming they would get shut out in FA.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:01 pm I'm thinking the road to DLo is Culver. Culver, Teague, Dieng for DLo sign and trade. Brooklyn signs Kyrie, maybe buckets, they need young cheap talent after that.
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
Since they would need to get to salary floor anyway at this point, they're taking Teague without any long term salary commitment (like Phi did with Redick as a free agent), so they only need very little incentive for it to make sense for them. That's why you could get by with Okogie and not have to give up Culver.
Brooklyn isn't expected to get anything of value in return for Russell since the cap space is what they want, so we don't have to actually match on the court talent to Russell. We only have to send out enough for an unrelated team to take on Teague for 1 year.
-
Oriole81
- Posts: 38110
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
that's what I said. The Knicks are taking the salary back in this case.mlhouse wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:20 pmThe Nets will not take salary back in any sign and trade.Oriole81 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:13 pmBrooklyn isn't getting the players back in this trade because their cap space is exhausted by the two FA signings. They would be going to the 3rd team, which can just absorb the outgoing MN players into their cap space. The Canis example used the Knicks, presuming they would get shut out in FA.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:01 pm I'm thinking the road to DLo is Culver. Culver, Teague, Dieng for DLo sign and trade. Brooklyn signs Kyrie, maybe buckets, they need young cheap talent after that.
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
Since they would need to get to salary floor anyway at this point, they're taking Teague without any long term salary commitment (like Phi did with Redick as a free agent), so they only need very little incentive for it to make sense for them. That's why you could get by with Okogie and not have to give up Culver.
Brooklyn isn't expected to get anything of value in return for Russell since the cap space is what they want, so we don't have to actually match on the court talent to Russell. We only have to send out enough for an unrelated team to take on Teague for 1 year.
2025 Froob NBA Draft
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 7386
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Poke!Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:01 pm I'm thinking the road to DLo is Culver. Culver, Teague, Dieng for DLo sign and trade. Brooklyn signs Kyrie, maybe buckets, they need young cheap talent after that.
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
Saric, Deing, JT, Culver, for DLo?
No sir I don't like it!
- Moses Scurry
- Posts: 18777
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Who?Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:29 pmPoke!Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:01 pm I'm thinking the road to DLo is Culver. Culver, Teague, Dieng for DLo sign and trade. Brooklyn signs Kyrie, maybe buckets, they need young cheap talent after that.
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
Saric, Deing, JT, Culver, for DLo?
No sir I don't like it!
- Mplsfonz
- Posts: 7386
- Joined: Mon Apr 08, 2019 8:49 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
We gave up Saric and #11 to get Culver. So we basically would be giving up all 4 for Russell.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:32 pmWho?Mplsfonz wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:29 pmPoke!Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Mon Jun 24, 2019 2:01 pm I'm thinking the road to DLo is Culver. Culver, Teague, Dieng for DLo sign and trade. Brooklyn signs Kyrie, maybe buckets, they need young cheap talent after that.
Poke holes in it all you want!!!!!!
Saric, Deing, JT, Culver, for DLo?
No sir I don't like it!
![]()
- Moses Scurry
- Posts: 18777
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Ok, now I follow.


