Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Moderator: Sylvester Stallone
- t_wrex
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - March 2019***
- Posts: 1891
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:09 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
You know what? Fuck D lo.
Saw his highlight reel and it was poopshit.
Plus no defense.
In one year, wiggins will be way easier to trade and we'll be in a PG heavy draft with 27 teams already set at point. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TO TANK TO LAND A BADASS PG.
Kat will have 3 years left, let em bitch.
Saw his highlight reel and it was poopshit.
Plus no defense.
In one year, wiggins will be way easier to trade and we'll be in a PG heavy draft with 27 teams already set at point. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TO TANK TO LAND A BADASS PG.
Kat will have 3 years left, let em bitch.
Last edited by t_wrex on Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Moses Scurry
- Posts: 18777
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I flip and flop on DLO.
I'd rather we keep everything, sign fricken Rubio for nothing and let this play out over the next two seasons. Let contracts expire or trade them, see if Wiggins with no excuses is crap or at least an average nba player. See where Culver is at. Limit Bob's minute. Find a PG next season in the draft or by trade.
I'd rather we keep everything, sign fricken Rubio for nothing and let this play out over the next two seasons. Let contracts expire or trade them, see if Wiggins with no excuses is crap or at least an average nba player. See where Culver is at. Limit Bob's minute. Find a PG next season in the draft or by trade.
-
jodaman01
- #1 Tom Thibodeau Fan
- Posts: 8870
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:06 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
https://lebronwire.usatoday.com/2019/06 ... o-russell/
Let’s see Lakers, LeBron, Davis and Kuzma or Wolves, KAT and gutted roster needed to pay him.
Time to get real here, what is Rosas’s “Plan B”, what else does he have up his sleeve?
Let’s see Lakers, LeBron, Davis and Kuzma or Wolves, KAT and gutted roster needed to pay him.
Time to get real here, what is Rosas’s “Plan B”, what else does he have up his sleeve?
- T_J
- Posts: 9720
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:53 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Maybe chill out a week and find out? Geezus.jodaman01 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:41 pm https://lebronwire.usatoday.com/2019/06 ... o-russell/
Let’s see Lakers, LeBron, Davis and Kuzma or Wolves, KAT and gutted roster needed to pay him.
Time to get real here, what is Rosas’s “Plan B”, what else does he have up his sleeve?
-
HeHateMe
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 18510
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I don't know that Wiggins will be way easier to trade until maybe 2021. But, what we don't know yet is how many teams panic when guys come off the board fairly fast and they're sitting with a crap ton of cap space (see my list on the last page).t_wrex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:02 pm You know what? Fuck D lo.
Saw his highlight reel and it was poopshit.
Plus no defense.
In one year, wiggins will be way easier to trade and we'll be in a PG heavy draft with 27 teams already set at point. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TO TANK TO LAND A BADASS PG.
Kat will have 3 years left, let em bitch.
-
HeHateMe
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 18510
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Rubio ain't coming. The Windhorst, Zach Lowe, other ESPN talking heads all seem to think it's Indiana.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:08 pm I flip and flop on DLO.
I'd rather we keep everything, sign fricken Rubio for nothing and let this play out over the next two seasons. Let contracts expire or trade them, see if Wiggins with no excuses is crap or at least an average nba player. See where Culver is at. Limit Bob's minute. Find a PG next season in the draft or by trade.
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Cannot get over the Rubio fascination. He was not a good NBA player overall. In the 1990s he might have been an all-star but the game isn't suited for his game. I repeat myself a lot but the fact that he never improved his shooting is one of the biggest Wolves disappointments of all.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 3:48 pmRubio ain't coming. The Windhorst, Zach Lowe, other ESPN talking heads all seem to think it's Indiana.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:08 pm I flip and flop on DLO.
I'd rather we keep everything, sign fricken Rubio for nothing and let this play out over the next two seasons. Let contracts expire or trade them, see if Wiggins with no excuses is crap or at least an average nba player. See where Culver is at. Limit Bob's minute. Find a PG next season in the draft or by trade.
- Moses Scurry
- Posts: 18777
- Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2017 12:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
My point was not Rubio, the point was I'd be happy with any cheap stop gap until we get a long term PG. Thought that was obvious but apparently not.
-
HeHateMe
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 18510
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
My guess is if no Russell, it's Tyus and Teague for another year.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:17 pm My point was not Rubio, the point was I'd be happy with any cheap stop gap until we get a long term PG. Thought that was obvious but apparently not.
- t_wrex
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - March 2019***
- Posts: 1891
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:09 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Wiggins will be 20% easier to trade (4vs 5 years) if he stays the same. He can only get better and he's got better guys to train him and he knows he hasn't been shit lately.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 3:46 pmI don't know that Wiggins will be way easier to trade until maybe 2021. But, what we don't know yet is how many teams panic when guys come off the board fairly fast and they're sitting with a crap ton of cap space (see my list on the last page).t_wrex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:02 pm You know what? Fuck D lo.
Saw his highlight reel and it was poopshit.
Plus no defense.
In one year, wiggins will be way easier to trade and we'll be in a PG heavy draft with 27 teams already set at point. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TO TANK TO LAND A BADASS PG.
Kat will have 3 years left, let em bitch.
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
The problem with this "stop gap" mentality is it has very little future value. Even if the PG of the future is from next year's draft or some other future acquisition, the Wolves need to spend focus on playing PGs that can make a future contribution to depth. Putting Rubio or Teague or some other "stop gap" hurts the team going forward even if it means a handful more wins because of their experience.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:17 pm My point was not Rubio, the point was I'd be happy with any cheap stop gap until we get a long term PG. Thought that was obvious but apparently not.
I can see signing Ty Jones to a reasonable extension depending on the market (I think he is going to get double that though) and just starting him as the starter all season with a rookie/young backup and maybe even a 3rd young PG that you plug in too. Maybe you hit on one. Maybe if your scouting and development is very good, one of those young guys breaks out and is the PG of the future.
The problem is, playing the stop gap game means you will never, ever, find out.
-
HeHateMe
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 18510
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
He's already done with one year. 4 to go. I think I get what you're saying though... each year he becomes 20% easier to move... maybe. Guess we'll see.t_wrex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:44 pmWiggins will be 20% easier to trade (4vs 5 years) if he stays the same. He can only get better and he's got better guys to train him and he knows he hasn't been shit lately.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 3:46 pmI don't know that Wiggins will be way easier to trade until maybe 2021. But, what we don't know yet is how many teams panic when guys come off the board fairly fast and they're sitting with a crap ton of cap space (see my list on the last page).t_wrex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:02 pm You know what? Fuck D lo.
Saw his highlight reel and it was poopshit.
Plus no defense.
In one year, wiggins will be way easier to trade and we'll be in a PG heavy draft with 27 teams already set at point. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TO TANK TO LAND A BADASS PG.
Kat will have 3 years left, let em bitch.
- jffl_commish
- Posts: 28490
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:33 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
20%, are we talking about his long 2 shooting percentage?
Let's get Tropical
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
One of the biggest fallacies about Andrew Wiggins being a bad player and taking bad shots is the fact that in the NBA not every shot your offense generates is going to be a good shot. The question then becomes, when your offense has to take a shot, who do you want taking it. Much of Wiggins' inefficiency is caused by the inefficiency of the Wolves offense. He is getting the vast majority of the bad shots and the fact is, of the Wolves, he is the one I want taking them. Someone has to.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 4:53 pmHe's already done with one year. 4 to go. I think I get what you're saying though... each year he becomes 20% easier to move... maybe. Guess we'll see.
- TrueBlue
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:27 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
mlhouse wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:16 pmOne of the biggest fallacies about Andrew Wiggins being a bad player and taking bad shots is the fact that in the NBA not every shot your offense generates is going to be a good shot. The question then becomes, when your offense has to take a shot, who do you want taking it. Much of Wiggins' inefficiency is caused by the inefficiency of the Wolves offense. He is getting the vast majority of the bad shots and the fact is, of the Wolves, he is the one I want taking them. Someone has to.
Spoiler:
- jffl_commish
- Posts: 28490
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:33 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
mlhouse is Wiggins' brother. That's the only logical explanation for that level of ball washing.
Let's get Tropical
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Nope. Mitchell is not my father.jffl_commish wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:21 pm mlhouse is Wiggins' brother. That's the only logical explanation for that level of ball washing.
Ball washing or not, this is the reality of the Wolves. We have Wiggins and Towns. I will go with the claim that a guy who as a 21 year old wing player averaged 23.6 points per game is a pretty good player with lots of potential. You develop that game correctly with another future cog in Towns, the right offense and supporting players, you are going to have some player. The Wolves....nope.
- witljon
- Posts: 27107
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:57 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I thought he looked pretty good, but there must be a reason the Nets aren't interested.t_wrex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:02 pm You know what? Fuck D lo.
Saw his highlight reel and it was poopshit.
Plus no defense.
In one year, wiggins will be way easier to trade and we'll be in a PG heavy draft with 27 teams already set at point. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TO TANK TO LAND A BADASS PG.
Kat will have 3 years left, let em bitch.
Bring ya ass!
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
The Nets are interested. The issue isn't necessarily Russell, but they want two tier one free agents instead.witljon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:49 pmI thought he looked pretty good, but there must be a reason the Nets aren't interested.t_wrex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:02 pm You know what? Fuck D lo.
Saw his highlight reel and it was poopshit.
Plus no defense.
In one year, wiggins will be way easier to trade and we'll be in a PG heavy draft with 27 teams already set at point. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TO TANK TO LAND A BADASS PG.
Kat will have 3 years left, let em bitch.
- witljon
- Posts: 27107
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:57 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
We'll probably just go with Teague and Tyus as our PGs for next season.Moses Scurry wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:08 pm I flip and flop on DLO.
I'd rather we keep everything, sign fricken Rubio for nothing and let this play out over the next two seasons. Let contracts expire or trade them, see if Wiggins with no excuses is crap or at least an average nba player. See where Culver is at. Limit Bob's minute. Find a PG next season in the draft or by trade.
Bring ya ass!
-
Corre Ricky Corre
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:41 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Let's be real, we aren't getting Dlo... There are just too many teams that can pay him more and make an easier much easier. I'd love to make a move for him but I just don't see it happening.
- TrueBlue
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:27 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I'm not a DLo guy, but I am a KAT guy. If he makes KAT happy, do whatever to get him. If KAT doesn't actually care, then fuck em.
Spoiler:
- witljon
- Posts: 27107
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:57 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
They are interested in D'Angelo? I thought Kyrie.mlhouse wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:51 pmThe Nets are interested. The issue isn't necessarily Russell, but they want two tier one free agents instead.witljon wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:49 pmI thought he looked pretty good, but there must be a reason the Nets aren't interested.t_wrex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 2:02 pm You know what? Fuck D lo.
Saw his highlight reel and it was poopshit.
Plus no defense.
In one year, wiggins will be way easier to trade and we'll be in a PG heavy draft with 27 teams already set at point. WE DONT EVEN HAVE TO TANK TO LAND A BADASS PG.
Kat will have 3 years left, let em bitch.
Bring ya ass!
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
- t_wrex
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - March 2019***
- Posts: 1891
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 1:09 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
Come on man make a counterpoint.TrueBlue wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:18 pmmlhouse wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:16 pmOne of the biggest fallacies about Andrew Wiggins being a bad player and taking bad shots is the fact that in the NBA not every shot your offense generates is going to be a good shot. The question then becomes, when your offense has to take a shot, who do you want taking it. Much of Wiggins' inefficiency is caused by the inefficiency of the Wolves offense. He is getting the vast majority of the bad shots and the fact is, of the Wolves, he is the one I want taking them. Someone has to.![]()
![]()
![]()
The ability is there. I personally just think he's burned out and he's stuck mentally.
He reminds me right now of a guy from "fantasy island" where he was granted basketball superstardom but didn't realize what a hell it is getting scrutinized and isn't up to par with the intense thankless training. Maybe his wife is goin psycho on em too, adding to the shit factor.
Dude needs a smaller role, less minutes, a few words of encouragement and smarter training.
- Hoop Dreams
- ***Official 2022 Froob Bracket Winner***
- Posts: 43727
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 1:43 pm
- Hoop Dreams
- ***Official 2022 Froob Bracket Winner***
- Posts: 43727
- Joined: Sun Nov 12, 2017 1:43 pm
- The Replacements
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:37 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
I think that sums up my feelings as well. I won't be upset if they don't get him. I believe it will cost too much to have him on the roster. I believe Rosas has something else in the works. Garland doesn't seem like a fit in Cleveland and Culver is not a great fit here. Could something still be in the works? I just get the feeling Culver will never play a game for the Twolves. Just a hunch.
-
thinktank
- Posts: 29459
- Joined: Fri Sep 01, 2017 11:43 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
It’s likely that we don’t get Russell. We knew this well before the Lakers rumor.
Nevertheless, this new breed of anti-Rosas froobs is gonna FREAK OUT if and when we don’t acquire Russell.
This complaining is based on nothing but 11 + Saric for Culver, which is a GREAT TRADE eight days a week.
Nevertheless, this new breed of anti-Rosas froobs is gonna FREAK OUT if and when we don’t acquire Russell.
This complaining is based on nothing but 11 + Saric for Culver, which is a GREAT TRADE eight days a week.
- TrueBlue
- Posts: 1706
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 11:27 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Rusell?
There is no counter to be made vs a guy saying Wiggins takes bad shots because someone has to.t_wrex wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 6:04 pmCome on man make a counterpoint.Sally 2.0 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:18 pmmlhouse wrote: ↑Tue Jun 25, 2019 5:16 pm
One of the biggest fallacies about Andrew Wiggins being a bad player and taking bad shots is the fact that in the NBA not every shot your offense generates is going to be a good shot. The question then becomes, when your offense has to take a shot, who do you want taking it. Much of Wiggins' inefficiency is caused by the inefficiency of the Wolves offense. He is getting the vast majority of the bad shots and the fact is, of the Wolves, he is the one I want taking them. Someone has to.![]()
![]()
![]()
The ability is there. I personally just think he's burned out and he's stuck mentally.
He reminds me right now of a guy from "fantasy island" where he was granted basketball superstardom but didn't realize what a hell it is getting scrutinized and isn't up to par with the intense thankless training. Maybe his wife is goin psycho on em too, adding to the shit factor.
Dude needs a smaller role, less minutes, a few words of encouragement and smarter training.
NO. No one has to take midrange pull up fade-away with 13 left on the shot clock. Ever.
If someone is going to pretend like that’s not real then there’s no argument to be had, they aren’t watching the games or they’re blinded by their love for a player.
Spoiler:







