MN Rube Chat

Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:14 pm

Riley91 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:13 pm This guy has had like 20 strokes now and the republicans STILL can't beat him

True but now look what we're left with...

Riley91 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:20 pm

Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:14 pm

Riley91 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:13 pm This guy has had like 20 strokes now and the republicans STILL can't beat him

True but now look what we're left with...

Yeah and the voters STILL prefer him to the republican alternative!

Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:26 pm

Riley91 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:20 pm

Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:14 pm

True but now look what we're left with...

Yeah and the voters STILL prefer him to the republican alternative!

I bet if they voted today things would be different...guy is almost a vegetable!!

BTW....you hittin the reefer tonight??!!

Riley91 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:27 pm

Hornets wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:26 pm

Riley91 wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 5:20 pm

Yeah and the voters STILL prefer him to the republican alternative!

I bet if they voted today things would be different...guy is almost a vegetable!!

BTW....you hittin the reefer tonight??!!

Just a little bit.. don't want to end up like Fetterman! I'm sure I'd have to smoke a LOT of dope to have as many strokes as that guy has though!!

mlhouse wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:24 am

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:13 am

mlhouse wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 10:05 am


but if we eliminated every person in Congress and elected office with similar lies, starting with Joseph Biden, the halls of government would be pretty empty.

Sounds like a good idea. We should do this.

Well, the WE is the voters of the United States. You would think they would want to use their vote more wisely. But they vote for people like John Fetterman who was totally impaired.

stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:32 pm

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:20 pm

stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:05 pm Kind of hilarious Republicans couldn't find a better candidate than Dr Conman to run against John The Vegetable. How do you lose that race?

Oh your party won by hiding Fetterman from debates and having his doctor provide a general health report that hid his obvious mental and physical disabilities.

You see, the left didn't want to expose Fetterman for who he really is.....

Kind of like when Biden's handlers had him hide in his basement while campaigning for POTUS.

Sad, really.

Clearly you think this is a binary party issue. So why would it have mattered? In your mind you can only be a Dem or a Con, and all Dems vote Dem and all Cons vote Con, right? Nominate a non-sleezy grifter and you'll likely have better luck.

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 6:54 pm

mlhouse wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:24 am

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 11:13 am

Sounds like a good idea. We should do this.

Well, the WE is the voters of the United States. You would think they would want to use their vote more wisely. But they vote for people like John Fetterman who was totally impaired.

I do. I don’t vote for Democrats or Republicans because they have decided they can continually produce terrible candidates and still get votes because people are overall like lemmings that will vote for a letter no matter who it is.

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:32 pm

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:20 pm

Oh your party won by hiding Fetterman from debates and having his doctor provide a general health report that hid his obvious mental and physical disabilities.

You see, the left didn't want to expose Fetterman for who he really is.....

Kind of like when Biden's handlers had him hide in his basement while campaigning for POTUS.

Sad, really.

Clearly you think this is a binary party issue. So why would it have mattered? In your mind you can only be a Dem or a Con, and all Dems vote Dem and all Cons vote Con, right? Nominate a non-sleezy grifter and you'll likely have better luck.

So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.

That is all we need to know about you and your party.

Godspeed.

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:32 pm

Clearly you think this is a binary party issue. So why would it have mattered? In your mind you can only be a Dem or a Con, and all Dems vote Dem and all Cons vote Con, right? Nominate a non-sleezy grifter and you'll likely have better luck.

So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.

That is all we need to know about you and your party.

Godspeed.

I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am

So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.

That is all we need to know about you and your party.

Godspeed.

I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.

Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.

One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.

And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.

Godspeed,.

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 2:32 pm

Clearly you think this is a binary party issue. So why would it have mattered? In your mind you can only be a Dem or a Con, and all Dems vote Dem and all Cons vote Con, right? Nominate a non-sleezy grifter and you'll likely have better luck.

So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.

That is all we need to know about you and your party.

Godspeed.

I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:24 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am

So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.

That is all we need to know about you and your party.

Godspeed.

I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.

This post is spot on.

If the republicans are that inept as a party that they can’t produce candidates good enough to beat Fetterman and Biden then they should take a long look in the mirror and replace their incompetent leadership with people who can.

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:23 am

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am

I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.

Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.

One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.

And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.

Godspeed.

You didn't know about his condition during the race? Were you not paying attention?

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:27 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:23 am

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 am

Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.

One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.

And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.

Godspeed.

You didn't know about his condition during the race? Were you not paying attention?

I didn't say that, you did, giggle tits.

Now piss off, you bore me, thinktank.

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:31 am

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:27 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:23 am

You didn't know about his condition during the race? Were you not paying attention?

I didn't say that, you did, giggle tits.

Now piss off, you bore me, thinktank.

I appreciate you admitting defeat. Next time don't engage if you plan on bringing such weak nonsense. Fetterman looks more competent than your performance here, Butch.

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:40 am

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:31 am

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:27 am

I didn't say that, you did, giggle tits.

Now piss off, you bore me, thinktank.

I appreciate you admitting defeat. Next time don't engage if you plan on bringing such weak nonsense. Fetterman looks more competent than your performance here, Butch.

You engaged me, thinktank with your "weak nonsense."

But you keep believing that you won an internet debate because I am sure that makes you feel so much better about yourself.

Oh and keep up the good fight protecting your party, comrade.

They need all the help they can get!

Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:20 pm

stinktaint wrote: ↑Fri Feb 10, 2023 1:05 pm Kind of hilarious Republicans couldn't find a better candidate than Dr Conman to run against John The Vegetable. How do you lose that race?

Oh your party won by hiding Fetterman from debates and having his doctor provide a general health report that hid his obvious mental and physical disabilities.

You see, the left didn't want to expose Fetterman for who he really is.....

Kind of like when Biden's handlers had him hide in his basement while campaigning for POTUS.

Sad, really.

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pm

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

How is that putting one man’s health over country?

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pm

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

You watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?

Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pm

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

How is that putting one man’s health over country?

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:25 pm

Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pm

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

How is that putting one man’s health over country?

Wouldn't it be the other way around? Putting the country over his health?

Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:27 pm

stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:25 pm

Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pm

How is that putting one man’s health over country?

Wouldn't it be the other way around? Putting the country over his health?

Yeah. It doesn’t make sense.

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:21 pm

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pm

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

You watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?

Oh shit! Didn’t he get your permission before he did? That’s a pretty serious breach

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:50 pm

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:21 pm

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pm

You watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?

Oh shit! Didn’t he get your permission before he did? That’s a pretty serious breach

Get permission?
I'm wondering if he watched the debates for all 30+ senate races? Did he watch the debates for all the house seats, too? That's a strong interest in political conversation.

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 9:32 pm

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:50 pm

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:21 pm

Oh shit! Didn’t he get your permission before he did? That’s a pretty serious breach

Get permission?
I'm wondering if he watched the debates for all 30+ senate races? Did he watch the debates for all the house seats, too? That's a strong interest in political conversation.

Why does he have to watch all 30? It’s very possible to watch one or two that have interest without committing to watch every race.

I watched some of it myself because it was broadcast nationally and it was a train wreck with two very flawed candidates. But I didn’t watch all 30 and I suspect most didn’t because I would guess most were not broadcast nationally.

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pm

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

You watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:51 pm

PurpleFloyd wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 9:32 pm

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 8:50 pm

Get permission?
I'm wondering if he watched the debates for all 30+ senate races? Did he watch the debates for all the house seats, too? That's a strong interest in political conversation.

Why does he have to watch all 30? It’s very possible to watch one or two that have interest without committing to watch every race.

I watched some of it myself because it was broadcast nationally and it was a train wreck with two very flawed candidates. But I didn’t watch all 30 and I suspect most didn’t because I would guess most were not broadcast nationally.

He didn't need my permission nor did I suggest he must watch all of them. Those were your odd pivots.
I was curious if he did watch them all and curious why he'd watch that one. There's no need to make it into a thing.

Night Train wrote: ↑Sun Feb 12, 2023 6:10 am

Ask Not wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 6:27 pm

Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.

You watched a senatorial debate taking place in another state?

It was a national story with national coverage. His debate performance was a hot topic for a day or two. Did you see any of that? What did you think?

I don't own a dog, but I don't need to own a dog to know animal abuse when I see it.