Re: John Fetterman...
Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 4:54 pm
Hopefully this gigantic numb-nuts can stop having strokes long enough to go vote on the issues. He was elected to do a job, not to keep having strokes.
A site to discuss Minnesota sports, news, culture, and more
https://www.forum.mnrubecentral.org/
When a guy continues to work a demanding and stressful job after suffering a serious health emergency he is obviously putting... himself... first. Or something.Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pmHow is that putting one man’s health over country?Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
Huge kudos to all the posters in this little midwest-based forum who were able to uncover that he was mentally and physically challenged despite the Dem party hiding those facts so well.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 amAgain, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 amI don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am
So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.
That is all we need to know about you and your party.
Godspeed.![]()
One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.
And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.
Godspeed,.
Fetterman probably should have had more than one debate.Ask Not wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:32 amHuge kudos to all the posters in this little midwest-based forum who were able to uncover that he was mentally and physically challenged despite the Dem party hiding those facts so well.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 amAgain, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am
I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon.![]()
One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.
And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.
Godspeed,.
In retrospect, we probably should have shared our sleuthian findings with the rest of the country or at least Pennsylvania.
I don't think that's way out of line these days. What's the right amount of debates?Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:41 pmFetterman probably should have had more than one debate.Ask Not wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:32 amHuge kudos to all the posters in this little midwest-based forum who were able to uncover that he was mentally and physically challenged despite the Dem party hiding those facts so well.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 am
Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.
One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.
And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.
Godspeed,.
In retrospect, we probably should have shared our sleuthian findings with the rest of the country or at least Pennsylvania.
Donchathink?
Ask Not wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:46 pmI don't think that's way out of line these days. What's the right amount of debates?Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:41 pmFetterman probably should have had more than one debate.Ask Not wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:32 am
Huge kudos to all the posters in this little midwest-based forum who were able to uncover that he was mentally and physically challenged despite the Dem party hiding those facts so well.
In retrospect, we probably should have shared our sleuthian findings with the rest of the country or at least Pennsylvania.
Donchathink?
It seems to me your concern that the R's couldn't find someone who could defeat a candidate who was obviously limited. The same goes for president - Biden was flawed from the very first primary debate.
How weak of him! A true man would shove those feelings way way way down deep into the pit of his stomach, lock it in a tiny box and never worry about it again. Mental health is for pussies.
Hi Rusty-
He definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.
Fetterman has had like 15 strokes but he STILL beat the Republicans, Butch!Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 amHe definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.
If true, then he should have never ran for office.
And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.
Sad, really.
I guess my point went right over your head, bubbles.Riley91 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:35 amFetterman has had like 15 strokes but he STILL beat the Republicans, Butch!Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 amHe definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.
If true, then he should have never ran for office.
And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.
Sad, really.
How did the left prop him up? By voting for him? By supporting his campaign vs. a bad Republican opponent?Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 amHe definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.
If true, then he should have never ran for office.
And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.
Sad, really.
The man should have never run for office.Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:41 amHow did the left prop him up? By voting for him? By supporting his campaign vs. a bad Republican opponent?Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 amHe definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.
If true, then he should have never ran for office.
And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.
Sad, really.
He was clearly in shape - he won. There can be no disputing he was in shape to run - none.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:43 amThe man should have never run for office.Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:41 amHow did the left prop him up? By voting for him? By supporting his campaign vs. a bad Republican opponent?Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 am
He definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.
If true, then he should have never ran for office.
And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.
Sad, really.
He was in no condition to do so.
But you keep making jokes about John Fetterman.
Sad, really.
You're not being serious.Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:47 amHe was clearly in shape - he won. There can be no disputing he was in shape to run - none.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:43 amThe man should have never run for office.
He was in no condition to do so.
But you keep making jokes about John Fetterman.
Sad, really.
I have yet to make a joke about Fetterman. I am more than happy to make fun of your misunderstood narrative, however.
Good day, friend.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:49 amYou're not being serious.Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:47 amHe was clearly in shape - he won. There can be no disputing he was in shape to run - none.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:43 am
The man should have never run for office.
He was in no condition to do so.
But you keep making jokes about John Fetterman.
Sad, really.
I have yet to make a joke about Fetterman. I am more than happy to make fun of your misunderstood narrative, however.
Therefore, this exchange is over.
Good day, sir.
Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:51 amGood day, friend.Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:49 amYou're not being serious.
Therefore, this exchange is over.
Good day, sir.![]()
What're they going to do, 'Weekend at Bernie's' him for the next 6 months?
Night Train wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:29 amWhat're they going to do, 'Weekend at Bernie's' him for the next 6 months?
Keep him in the hospital under “clinical depression” where you can’t judge or question it..Night Train wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:29 amWhat're they going to do, 'Weekend at Bernie's' him for the next 6 months?