Page 14 of 27

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 12, 2023 4:54 pm
by Riley91
Hopefully this gigantic numb-nuts can stop having strokes long enough to go vote on the issues. He was elected to do a job, not to keep having strokes.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 9:00 am
by DonaldDouchebag
Jimi_Thing wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:25 pm
Night Train wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 4:17 pm Doesn't sound like he's going to get back to fully functional after this one. This one might have caused permanent brain damage. Anyone that watched him in the debate should have known he was a ticking timebomb. But party, and one man's health over country.
How is that putting one man’s health over country?
When a guy continues to work a demanding and stressful job after suffering a serious health emergency he is obviously putting... himself... first. Or something.

Yeah, it doesn't make any sense. :shrug:

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:32 am
by Ask Not
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 am
stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:03 am

So you are quite pleased with John Fetterman despite his inability to fulfill his duties as U.S. Senator because he is clearly physically and mentally challenged. Got it.

That is all we need to know about you and your party.

Godspeed.
I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon. :lol:
Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.

One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.

And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.

Godspeed,.
Huge kudos to all the posters in this little midwest-based forum who were able to uncover that he was mentally and physically challenged despite the Dem party hiding those facts so well.

In retrospect, we probably should have shared our sleuthian findings with the rest of the country or at least Pennsylvania.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:34 am
by chris_numbers
Americans love a special needs candidate. He will run for president and probably win. It feels good to vote for someone who shouldn’t win. We are the participation trophy country.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:41 pm
by Butch Bradford
Ask Not wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:32 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 am
stinktaint wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 10:47 am

I don't give a shit about Fetterman, he's not my Senator. I just find it comical your party couldn't beat the vegetable. Find a better candidate if you can't beat that goon. :lol:
Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.

One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.

And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.

Godspeed,.
Huge kudos to all the posters in this little midwest-based forum who were able to uncover that he was mentally and physically challenged despite the Dem party hiding those facts so well.

In retrospect, we probably should have shared our sleuthian findings with the rest of the country or at least Pennsylvania.
Fetterman probably should have had more than one debate.

Donchathink?

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:46 pm
by Ask Not
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:41 pm
Ask Not wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:32 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sat Feb 11, 2023 11:21 am

Again, John Fetterman's physical and mental challenges were hidden by your party.

One can only conclude that your party wanted/needed his vote for majority in the U.S. Senate despite the fact that it was immoral to have him run a race he never should have ran in his condition.

And again, this speaks volumes about you and your party.

Godspeed,.
Huge kudos to all the posters in this little midwest-based forum who were able to uncover that he was mentally and physically challenged despite the Dem party hiding those facts so well.

In retrospect, we probably should have shared our sleuthian findings with the rest of the country or at least Pennsylvania.
Fetterman probably should have had more than one debate.

Donchathink?
I don't think that's way out of line these days. What's the right amount of debates?
It seems to me your concern that the R's couldn't find someone who could defeat a candidate who was obviously limited. The same goes for president - Biden was flawed from the very first primary debate.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Mon Feb 13, 2023 8:20 pm
by NotRasho
Imagine allowing morons like this to represent you and actually defending them.

Hows that "representative" democracy working out for you? I wouldnt know, none of the shitbags represent me.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2023 2:24 pm
by Butch Bradford
Ask Not wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:46 pm
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 12:41 pm
Ask Not wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 10:32 am

Huge kudos to all the posters in this little midwest-based forum who were able to uncover that he was mentally and physically challenged despite the Dem party hiding those facts so well.

In retrospect, we probably should have shared our sleuthian findings with the rest of the country or at least Pennsylvania.
Fetterman probably should have had more than one debate.

Donchathink?
I don't think that's way out of line these days. What's the right amount of debates?
It seems to me your concern that the R's couldn't find someone who could defeat a candidate who was obviously limited. The same goes for president - Biden was flawed from the very first primary debate.
:lol:

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 7:13 pm
by ForCaleb
This man needed rest and care from those who loved him not to be pressured from his wife to run for senate. Sad, really


Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 8:05 pm
by Ask Not
Message boarders can assess cause/blame for a person's clinical depression now? How nice.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 9:01 pm
by DonaldDouchebag
Ask Not wrote: ↑Thu Feb 16, 2023 8:05 pm Message boarders can assess cause/blame for a person's clinical depression now? How nice.
Liberals are at fault for a man’s mental health struggles.

Pro tip: it will always be the liberal’s-fault.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 9:06 pm
by ForCaleb
Ask Not wrote: ↑Thu Feb 16, 2023 8:05 pm Message boarders can assess cause/blame for a person's clinical depression now? How nice.
It’s called an opinion. Stay aggrieved and keep holding the line for Democrats. You don’t even hide it anymore.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2023 9:09 pm
by cunningham
Politics sucks

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 6:29 am
by Night Train
It appears the job may be too much for him to handle. "You mean I'll actually have to work? And my schedule looks like what again?"

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2023 9:40 am
by Bull
Ask Not wrote: ↑Thu Feb 16, 2023 8:05 pm Message boarders can assess cause/blame for a person's clinical depression now? How nice.
How weak of him! A true man would shove those feelings way way way down deep into the pit of his stomach, lock it in a tiny box and never worry about it again. Mental health is for pussies.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
by Rusty Kuntz

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:16 am
by Ask Not
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
Hi Rusty-
Who is John? I'm not familiar.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 am
by Butch Bradford
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
He definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.

If true, then he should have never ran for office.

And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.

Sad, really.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:35 am
by Riley91
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 am
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
He definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.

If true, then he should have never ran for office.

And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.

Sad, really.
Fetterman has had like 15 strokes but he STILL beat the Republicans, Butch!

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:37 am
by Butch Bradford
Riley91 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:35 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 am
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
He definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.

If true, then he should have never ran for office.

And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.

Sad, really.
Fetterman has had like 15 strokes but he STILL beat the Republicans, Butch!
I guess my point went right over your head, bubbles.

No surprises there!

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:41 am
by Ask Not
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 am
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
He definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.

If true, then he should have never ran for office.

And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.

Sad, really.
How did the left prop him up? By voting for him? By supporting his campaign vs. a bad Republican opponent?

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:43 am
by Butch Bradford
Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:41 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 am
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
He definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.

If true, then he should have never ran for office.

And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.

Sad, really.
How did the left prop him up? By voting for him? By supporting his campaign vs. a bad Republican opponent?
The man should have never run for office.

He was in no condition to do so.

But you keep making jokes about John Fetterman.

Sad, really.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:47 am
by Ask Not
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:43 am
Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:41 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:33 am

He definitely showed signs of being brain dead during the one and only debate his camp agreed to.

If true, then he should have never ran for office.

And yet the left propped up this mentally and physically disabled man using his "blue collar, regular Joe that wears a hoodie" persona with the sole purpose of gaining the Senate majority.

Sad, really.
How did the left prop him up? By voting for him? By supporting his campaign vs. a bad Republican opponent?
The man should have never run for office.

He was in no condition to do so.

But you keep making jokes about John Fetterman.

Sad, really.
He was clearly in shape - he won. There can be no disputing he was in shape to run - none.
I have yet to make a joke about Fetterman. I am more than happy to make fun of your misunderstood narrative, however.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:49 am
by Butch Bradford
Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:47 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:43 am
Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:41 am

How did the left prop him up? By voting for him? By supporting his campaign vs. a bad Republican opponent?
The man should have never run for office.

He was in no condition to do so.

But you keep making jokes about John Fetterman.

Sad, really.
He was clearly in shape - he won. There can be no disputing he was in shape to run - none.
I have yet to make a joke about Fetterman. I am more than happy to make fun of your misunderstood narrative, however.
You're not being serious.

Therefore, this exchange is over.

Good day, sir.

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:51 am
by Ask Not
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:49 am
Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:47 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:43 am

The man should have never run for office.

He was in no condition to do so.

But you keep making jokes about John Fetterman.

Sad, really.
He was clearly in shape - he won. There can be no disputing he was in shape to run - none.
I have yet to make a joke about Fetterman. I am more than happy to make fun of your misunderstood narrative, however.
You're not being serious.

Therefore, this exchange is over.

Good day, sir.
Good day, friend. :beer:

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:52 am
by Butch Bradford
Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:51 am
Butch Bradford wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:49 am
Ask Not wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:47 am

He was clearly in shape - he won. There can be no disputing he was in shape to run - none.
I have yet to make a joke about Fetterman. I am more than happy to make fun of your misunderstood narrative, however.
You're not being serious.

Therefore, this exchange is over.

Good day, sir.
Good day, friend. :beer:
:beer:

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:52 am
by Jimi_Thing
I’m still trying to figure out the ‘choosing one man’s health over country’ bit. 😕

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:29 am
by Night Train
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
What're they going to do, 'Weekend at Bernie's' him for the next 6 months?

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:46 am
by Butch Bradford
Night Train wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:29 am
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
What're they going to do, 'Weekend at Bernie's' him for the next 6 months?
:lol:

I don't mean to laugh but that's funny!

Re: John Fetterman...

Posted: Sun Feb 26, 2023 12:29 pm
by Rusty Kuntz
Night Train wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 11:29 am
Rusty Kuntz wrote: ↑Sun Feb 26, 2023 10:07 am
What're they going to do, 'Weekend at Bernie's' him for the next 6 months?
Keep him in the hospital under “clinical depression” where you can’t judge or question it..