Zohran Mamdani is The Face of the Democrat Marxist Communist Party

[ForCaleb]

The snake-oil salesman is at it again

"I promise that I am going to make everything free"

*gets elected*

"Okay, now give me $4 million"


What a shit show:

[ForCaleb]

I really hope the Democratic Party continues to lean in on this Marxist as a leader of their party.

[mlhouse]

The snake-oil salesman is at it again

"I promise that I am going to make everything free"

*gets elected*

"Okay, now give me $4 million"


What a shit show:

Free is the most expensive thing ever. When you see something advertised as "free", every rational person in the world understands that the fine print and commitments will make it much more expensive than just buying the product outright. But, somehow Democratic voters do not put these rationale thoughts into their head when snake oil communists talk about "free" things from the government. Here is a hint as to why that is the case: governments are incompetent at delivering services.

If these people are really worried about "affordability" they should move away from the Deep Blue State/City they live in and move to a Red State.

If they cannot move, then they should study how the Red States operate and emulate them.

The way that government can deliver "affordability" is to become a smaller government: eliminate regulations, reduce taxes, reduce government spending, reduce government mandates, reduce government fees.

[Jimi_Thing]

The snake-oil salesman is at it again

"I promise that I am going to make everything free"

*gets elected*

"Okay, now give me $4 million"


What a shit show:

Free is the most expensive thing ever. When you see something advertised as "free", every rational person in the world understands that the fine print and commitments will make it much more expensive than just buying the product outright. But, somehow Democratic voters do not put these rationale thoughts into their head when snake oil communists talk about "free" things from the government. Here is a hint as to why that is the case: governments are incompetent at delivering services.

If these people are really worried about "affordability" they should move away from the Deep Blue State/City they live in and move to a Red State.

If they cannot move, then they should study how the Red States operate and emulate them.

The way that government can deliver "affordability" is to become a smaller government: eliminate regulations, reduce taxes, reduce government spending, reduce government mandates, reduce government fees.

Don't all politicians fund raise? Aside from his brown skin, is there an actual legitimate reason why it's 'begging for money' when this guy is doing it?

Your Queen is constantly fundraising and selling shit to dipshit followers but here you are pretending this guy is the abnormal one.

[Bull]

[Jimi_Thing]

ALSO - Almost all of them Red States that mlhouse suggests people move to are being subsidized by Blue States.

[mlhouse]

The snake-oil salesman is at it again

"I promise that I am going to make everything free"

*gets elected*

"Okay, now give me $4 million"


What a shit show:

Free is the most expensive thing ever. When you see something advertised as "free", every rational person in the world understands that the fine print and commitments will make it much more expensive than just buying the product outright. But, somehow Democratic voters do not put these rationale thoughts into their head when snake oil communists talk about "free" things from the government. Here is a hint as to why that is the case: governments are incompetent at delivering services.

If these people are really worried about "affordability" they should move away from the Deep Blue State/City they live in and move to a Red State.

If they cannot move, then they should study how the Red States operate and emulate them.

The way that government can deliver "affordability" is to become a smaller government: eliminate regulations, reduce taxes, reduce government spending, reduce government mandates, reduce government fees.

Don't all politicians fund raise? Aside from his brown skin, is there an actual legitimate reason why it's 'begging for money' when this guy is doing it?

Your Queen is constantly fundraising and selling shit to dipshit followers but here you are pretending this guy is the abnormal one.

I never commented on his fund raising. Only his government policies.

[ForCaleb]

The snake-oil salesman is at it again

"I promise that I am going to make everything free"

*gets elected*

"Okay, now give me $4 million"


What a shit show:

Free is the most expensive thing ever. When you see something advertised as "free", every rational person in the world understands that the fine print and commitments will make it much more expensive than just buying the product outright. But, somehow Democratic voters do not put these rationale thoughts into their head when snake oil communists talk about "free" things from the government. Here is a hint as to why that is the case: governments are incompetent at delivering services.

If these people are really worried about "affordability" they should move away from the Deep Blue State/City they live in and move to a Red State.

If they cannot move, then they should study how the Red States operate and emulate them.

The way that government can deliver "affordability" is to become a smaller government: eliminate regulations, reduce taxes, reduce government spending, reduce government mandates, reduce government fees.

Don't all politicians fund raise? Aside from his brown skin, is there an actual legitimate reason why it's 'begging for money' when this guy is doing it?

Your Queen is constantly fundraising and selling shit to dipshit followers but here you are pretending this guy is the abnormal one.

Leftists are incredible at race baiting thinking it's effective to refute political arguments.

They will go as low as their party will take them.

Trash.

[Bull]

ALSO - Almost all of them Red States that mlhouse suggests people move to are being subsidized by Blue States.

You mean.....SOCIALISM???!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!

[Jimi_Thing]

ALSO - Almost all of them Red States that mlhouse suggests people move to are being subsidized by Blue States.

You mean.....SOCIALISM???!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!

It's pretty undeniable that these Red States are living off the tit of Blue States like CA, NY, MN, etc. Imagine if it was the other way around.

[mlhouse]

ALSO - Almost all of them Red States that mlhouse suggests people move to are being subsidized by Blue States.

You mean.....SOCIALISM???!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!

It's pretty undeniable that these Red States are living off the tit of Blue States like CA, NY, MN, etc. Imagine if it was the other way around.

Depends on what you call a tit.

[Eroder]

ALSO - Almost all of them Red States that mlhouse suggests people move to are being subsidized by Blue States.

You mean.....SOCIALISM???!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!

It's pretty undeniable that these Red States are living off the tit of Blue States like CA, NY, MN, etc. Imagine if it was the other way around.

"Imagine if it was the other way around"



Most of MAGA can't even tell if they're pissing themselves, do you really think they could survive on their own?

[Jimi_Thing]

You mean.....SOCIALISM???!?!?!?!??!?!?!??!?!

It's pretty undeniable that these Red States are living off the tit of Blue States like CA, NY, MN, etc. Imagine if it was the other way around.

"Imagine if it was the other way around"



Most of MAGA can't even tell if they're pissing themselves, do you really think they could survive on their own?

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

[ForCaleb]

It's pretty undeniable that these Red States are living off the tit of Blue States like CA, NY, MN, etc. Imagine if it was the other way around.

"Imagine if it was the other way around"



Most of MAGA can't even tell if they're pissing themselves, do you really think they could survive on their own?

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

Yeah, its those evil parasitic red states is the reason why your theater boy is begging for donations to pay for all the free shit he's proposing.

Leftists brains have turned to mush.

[Eroder]

"Imagine if it was the other way around"



Most of MAGA can't even tell if they're pissing themselves, do you really think they could survive on their own?

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

Yeah, its those evil parasitic red states is the reason why your theater boy is begging for donations to pay for all the free shit he's proposing.

Leftists brains have turned to mush.

Can you tell when you're pissing yourself?

RHETORICAL

Spoiler:

I'm guessing I'll have "log-in issues" fairly soon!

[mlhouse]

It's pretty undeniable that these Red States are living off the tit of Blue States like CA, NY, MN, etc. Imagine if it was the other way around.

"Imagine if it was the other way around"



Most of MAGA can't even tell if they're pissing themselves, do you really think they could survive on their own?

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. The Red States do not need anything from the Blue States. You are using a metric that is absurd (net federal transfers) that do not take into account military appropriations, population age, and other "demographics" that are not STATE mandated, but the federal government.

IF we were really smart as a nation we would turn over these welfare programs to the states.

IF you want affordability, come to a Red State.

[Jimi_Thing]

"Imagine if it was the other way around"



Most of MAGA can't even tell if they're pissing themselves, do you really think they could survive on their own?

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. The Red States do not need anything from the Blue States. You are using a metric that is absurd (net federal transfers) that do not take into account military appropriations, population age, and other "demographics" that are not STATE mandated, but the federal government.

IF we were really smart as a nation we would turn over these welfare programs to the states.

IF you want affordability, come to a Red State.

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

[Eroder]

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. The Red States do not need anything from the Blue States. You are using a metric that is absurd (net federal transfers) that do not take into account military appropriations, population age, and other "demographics" that are not STATE mandated, but the federal government.

IF we were really smart as a nation we would turn over these welfare programs to the states.

IF you want affordability, come to a Red State.

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

Well, he is from Tennessee, one of the biggest welfare queens in the nation, so there is that...

[ForCaleb]

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. The Red States do not need anything from the Blue States. You are using a metric that is absurd (net federal transfers) that do not take into account military appropriations, population age, and other "demographics" that are not STATE mandated, but the federal government.

IF we were really smart as a nation we would turn over these welfare programs to the states.

IF you want affordability, come to a Red State.

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

You didn't refute anything he said. You obviously have no idea what you're talking about.

[ForCaleb]

Nice party, libs

[mlhouse]

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. The Red States do not need anything from the Blue States. You are using a metric that is absurd (net federal transfers) that do not take into account military appropriations, population age, and other "demographics" that are not STATE mandated, but the federal government.

IF we were really smart as a nation we would turn over these welfare programs to the states.

IF you want affordability, come to a Red State.

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

So you don't think old people should get their Social Security? That makes California a "donor" state?

Alabama, Mississippi are on that list for one reason. Not because of Red State policies, but because of Federal welfare laws. If you swapped the demographics of Minnesota with Mississippi it would swap how Federal welfare payments are made.

BTW, the huge academic gains made by Mississippi and other southern states should be emulated all across the United States. They have switched to phonetics based reading vs. the failed BS "whole word" academic fad that liberal education bureaucrats foisted on students. While the overall gains were impressive, the gains made by minority students we even more impressive.



And, again, if you want to agree that we should readdress our federal programs, including transfering the administration to the states, lets do that. I would guarantee that the Republican led states would see enormous gains while the Blue states and cities wallow in misery.

[Ask Not]

Learned today: teachers teach reading according their political beliefs.

[Bull]

Of course wouldn't be able to. They're parasitic states that need Blue States to survive but somehow the rest of the country should be more like them.

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. The Red States do not need anything from the Blue States. You are using a metric that is absurd (net federal transfers) that do not take into account military appropriations, population age, and other "demographics" that are not STATE mandated, but the federal government.

IF we were really smart as a nation we would turn over these welfare programs to the states.

IF you want affordability, come to a Red State.

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

[Jimi_Thing]

Learned today: teachers teach reading according their political beliefs.

This fucking place.

[Jimi_Thing]

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. The Red States do not need anything from the Blue States. You are using a metric that is absurd (net federal transfers) that do not take into account military appropriations, population age, and other "demographics" that are not STATE mandated, but the federal government.

IF we were really smart as a nation we would turn over these welfare programs to the states.

IF you want affordability, come to a Red State.

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

So you don't think old people should get their Social Security? That makes California a "donor" state?

Alabama, Mississippi are on that list for one reason. Not because of Red State policies, but because of Federal welfare laws. If you swapped the demographics of Minnesota with Mississippi it would swap how Federal welfare payments are made.

BTW, the huge academic gains made by Mississippi and other southern states should be emulated all across the United States. They have switched to phonetics based reading vs. the failed BS "whole word" academic fad that liberal education bureaucrats foisted on students. While the overall gains were impressive, the gains made by minority students we even more impressive.



And, again, if you want to agree that we should readdress our federal programs, including transfering the administration to the states, lets do that. I would guarantee that the Republican led states would see enormous gains while the Blue states and cities wallow in misery.

If only the rest of the country got up to speed with Mississippi in regards to education.

[Bull]

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

So you don't think old people should get their Social Security? That makes California a "donor" state?

Alabama, Mississippi are on that list for one reason. Not because of Red State policies, but because of Federal welfare laws. If you swapped the demographics of Minnesota with Mississippi it would swap how Federal welfare payments are made.

BTW, the huge academic gains made by Mississippi and other southern states should be emulated all across the United States. They have switched to phonetics based reading vs. the failed BS "whole word" academic fad that liberal education bureaucrats foisted on students. While the overall gains were impressive, the gains made by minority students we even more impressive.



And, again, if you want to agree that we should readdress our federal programs, including transfering the administration to the states, lets do that. I would guarantee that the Republican led states would see enormous gains while the Blue states and cities wallow in misery.

If only the rest of the country got up to speed with Mississippi in regards to education.

[mlhouse]

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

So you don't think old people should get their Social Security? That makes California a "donor" state?

Alabama, Mississippi are on that list for one reason. Not because of Red State policies, but because of Federal welfare laws. If you swapped the demographics of Minnesota with Mississippi it would swap how Federal welfare payments are made.

BTW, the huge academic gains made by Mississippi and other southern states should be emulated all across the United States. They have switched to phonetics based reading vs. the failed BS "whole word" academic fad that liberal education bureaucrats foisted on students. While the overall gains were impressive, the gains made by minority students we even more impressive.



And, again, if you want to agree that we should readdress our federal programs, including transfering the administration to the states, lets do that. I would guarantee that the Republican led states would see enormous gains while the Blue states and cities wallow in misery.

If only the rest of the country got up to speed with Mississippi in regards to education.

Absolutely. THe gains they have made over the past 5 years are remarkable, especially for African-American students. Switching to phonics based reading instruction, which is scientifically validated, has been very successful. Several other states are doing the same.

Whole word reading was just an academic fad that costs students.

The next step is to do the same with Common Core. Going back to basic math instruction will almost certainly have the same results once the other stupid fad is dumped.

I am not surprised you are completely unaware of this information. You live with your head stuck in the sand regurgitating what you are told.

[Eroder]

So you don't think old people should get their Social Security? That makes California a "donor" state?

Alabama, Mississippi are on that list for one reason. Not because of Red State policies, but because of Federal welfare laws. If you swapped the demographics of Minnesota with Mississippi it would swap how Federal welfare payments are made.

BTW, the huge academic gains made by Mississippi and other southern states should be emulated all across the United States. They have switched to phonetics based reading vs. the failed BS "whole word" academic fad that liberal education bureaucrats foisted on students. While the overall gains were impressive, the gains made by minority students we even more impressive.



And, again, if you want to agree that we should readdress our federal programs, including transfering the administration to the states, lets do that. I would guarantee that the Republican led states would see enormous gains while the Blue states and cities wallow in misery.

If only the rest of the country got up to speed with Mississippi in regards to education.

What are they? Like 52nd out of 50? (Using Trump math)

[BlackDog]

I really don't think you know what you are talking about. The Red States do not need anything from the Blue States. You are using a metric that is absurd (net federal transfers) that do not take into account military appropriations, population age, and other "demographics" that are not STATE mandated, but the federal government.

IF we were really smart as a nation we would turn over these welfare programs to the states.

IF you want affordability, come to a Red State.

It's the lack of military bases, old people, etc. that cause a state like California to be a donor state vs. states like Alabama, Mississippi, West Virginia, etc. that are all welfare states relying on the Blue State's tit to nourish them. Nobody believes your nonsense.

So you don't think old people should get their Social Security? That makes California a "donor" state?

Alabama, Mississippi are on that list for one reason. Not because of Red State policies, but because of Federal welfare laws. If you swapped the demographics of Minnesota with Mississippi it would swap how Federal welfare payments are made.

BTW, the huge academic gains made by Mississippi and other southern states should be emulated all across the United States. They have switched to phonetics based reading vs. the failed BS "whole word" academic fad that liberal education bureaucrats foisted on students. While the overall gains were impressive, the gains made by minority students we even more impressive.



And, again, if you want to agree that we should readdress our federal programs, including transfering the administration to the states, lets do that. I would guarantee that the Republican led states would see enormous gains while the Blue states and cities wallow in misery.

Wrong chart. That’s math, genius.

https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/profi ... ear=2024R3

Maybe switch to the reading chart to prove your point?

Or just ignore that since California doesn’t look so bad.

[BlackDog]

Either way, the socialist hellhole known as Minnesota stays on top.