Note to guests/lurkers of this site. To continue reading content on some of our boards you will need to create an account.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Registration is free and easy, just remember your password and check back after your account has been approved by an administrator.
Please use the "contact us" link at the bottom of the page if you have any issues.
Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Moderator: Sylvester Stallone
-
Corre Ricky Corre
- Posts: 3154
- Joined: Mon Sep 11, 2017 3:41 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Towns was with Russell.. He had to have talked to him.. Why would he post that to his IG without some kind of commitment from DLO... This is all just so odd.
- jffl_commish
- Posts: 28490
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2018 6:33 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
That part is the biggest mystery about this to me. I mean, he has to know that when Klay comes back he isn't starting. Right?OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pm
But again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?
Let's get Tropical
-
Stork311
- Posts: 2179
- Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2017 8:02 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Proximity to Humbolt county?
-
D_H
- Posts: 24780
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:13 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
jffl_commish wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:43 pmThat part is the biggest mystery about this to me. I mean, he has to know that when Klay comes back he isn't starting. Right?OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pm
But again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?
All 3 can be on the floor together, I don't see why they couldn't. However , Russell is an atrocious defensive player. Klay and Draymond would have to play all the defense on that team!!! I would assume they're getting a defensive-minded big sometime that can protect the rim.
- T_J
- Posts: 9720
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:53 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Maybe he ultimately didn't want to work/play with a good friend. It could be possible he wanted to keep work and friendship separate.
- UnFadeable21
- Posts: 12327
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 11:47 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Dlo could stay at the 2 and they move Klay to SF because no more iggy or KD at the position.jffl_commish wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:43 pmThat part is the biggest mystery about this to me. I mean, he has to know that when Klay comes back he isn't starting. Right?OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pm
But again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?
Elite Sports Mind featured in Forbes Magazine
-
RubeTube
- ***Official Gibby Award Winner - November 2018***
- Posts: 52158
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 2:10 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
That's hideous. I'm not convinced he can even be effective at the 2 with Klay out.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:54 pmDlo could stay at the 2 and they move Klay to SF because no more iggy or KD at the position.jffl_commish wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:43 pmThat part is the biggest mystery about this to me. I mean, he has to know that when Klay comes back he isn't starting. Right?OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pm
But again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?
Let's may a guy who has only proven himself for one year and move him to the 2. BRILLIANT!
DLo was close to playing himself out of the league and now he switches position?! I guess he got his money so it doesn't really matter. They were also talking he has a shoe deal with Nike that benefited him playing in a bigger market.
I hope he is as atrocious there as he's been before last year and GS can't move him via Woggins 2.0.
“We are nonviolent with people who are nonviolent with us.”
— Malcolm X
The Puppet Master
FUCK TRUMP!
FUCK ICE!
— Malcolm X
The Puppet Master
FUCK TRUMP!
FUCK ICE!
- LordNu
- Posts: 11100
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 2:15 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Someone mentioned earlier that his brand deals are expiring this offseason. Going to GS essentially maximises what he may ask for when doing those ancillary deals. Maybe that's what he wants to do in the next 3 months, then come to minny... I am too hopeful 
- LordNu
- Posts: 11100
- Joined: Sun Aug 27, 2017 2:15 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
That was a joke btw.DonaldDouchebag wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 1:25 pmAccording to one genius WC poster it's the only way they'll be able to sell tickets coming off an NBA championship.
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
I finally figured out why the Wolves were included in the sign and trade, and why Golden St. needed a 3rd party to facilitate the trade.OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pmBut again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:26 pmPush come to shove; would I be okay with the wolves moving two 1st round picks for Dlo. Yes but in the end, he chose the Warriors over us too so cant be too mad.OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:00 pm
I doubt that was the difference.
A chance to get a young pg that is supposedly super close with your superstar is worth that cost.
By doing a sign and trade Golden St. was "hard capped" meanign they could not go above the Apron in any transaction. So, they needed a 3rd Party to facilitate the trade by absorbing all of the excess filler contracts coming back to them from Brooklyn. Minnesota had a TPE that a. could absorb the players and b. wasn't going to be used so the Warriors paid us cash to help them make the deal.
- UnFadeable21
- Posts: 12327
- Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2017 11:47 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Dlo is 6’5. He play shooting guard just fine. He did it plenty last year with the Nets when Napier or Dinwiddle came in and played point.RubeTube wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 9:00 pmThat's hideous. I'm not convinced he can even be effective at the 2 with Klay out.UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:54 pmDlo could stay at the 2 and they move Klay to SF because no more iggy or KD at the position.jffl_commish wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:43 pm
That part is the biggest mystery about this to me. I mean, he has to know that when Klay comes back he isn't starting. Right?
Let's may a guy who has only proven himself for one year and move him to the 2. BRILLIANT!
DLo was close to playing himself out of the league and now he switches position?! I guess he got his money so it doesn't really matter. They were also talking he has a shoe deal with Nike that benefited him playing in a bigger market.
I hope he is as atrocious there as he's been before last year and GS can't move him via Woggins 2.0.
Elite Sports Mind featured in Forbes Magazine
-
mlhouse
- Posts: 32286
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2017 9:00 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Another note, the hard cap is probably why they had to renounce Jordan Bell's QO.
- witljon
- Posts: 27107
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2018 11:57 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
D’Angelo plays no defense and looks like a bad fit on the Warriors to me. It’s funny they didn’t go after Kawhi or some other big name.
Bring ya ass!
-
Big Head
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2018 9:44 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
There are currently only two teams that could sign Russell to a deal and that is with GS doing some tricky maneuvering to sign him. My guess is the Timberwolves needed more time to find acceptable deals to clear space, and he decided he couldn't wait that long and risk getting stuck with approximately $10 mil a year offers and picking between them - if Wolves couldn't figure out a way to make cap space.OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pmBut again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:26 pmPush come to shove; would I be okay with the wolves moving two 1st round picks for Dlo. Yes but in the end, he chose the Warriors over us too so cant be too mad.OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:00 pm
I doubt that was the difference.
A chance to get a young pg that is supposedly super close with your superstar is worth that cost.
- The Replacements
- Posts: 1846
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:37 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
The big difference is DLo is a ball dominant pick and roll player. Golden State runs a motion offense. Will they change to fit Russell or will Russell be required to move more off the ball? It will be interesting.D_H wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:46 pmjffl_commish wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:43 pmThat part is the biggest mystery about this to me. I mean, he has to know that when Klay comes back he isn't starting. Right?OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pm
But again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?
All 3 can be on the floor together, I don't see why they couldn't. However , Russell is an atrocious defensive player. Klay and Draymond would have to play all the defense on that team!!! I would assume they're getting a defensive-minded big sometime that can protect the rim.
-
jodaman01
- #1 Tom Thibodeau Fan
- Posts: 8870
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:06 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
So Rosas turned the Wolves into GSW’s cuckold.mlhouse wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 9:03 pmI finally figured out why the Wolves were included in the sign and trade, and why Golden St. needed a 3rd party to facilitate the trade.OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pmBut again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?UnFadeable21 wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:26 pm
Push come to shove; would I be okay with the wolves moving two 1st round picks for Dlo. Yes but in the end, he chose the Warriors over us too so cant be too mad.
By doing a sign and trade Golden St. was "hard capped" meanign they could not go above the Apron in any transaction. So, they needed a 3rd Party to facilitate the trade by absorbing all of the excess filler contracts coming back to them from Brooklyn. Minnesota had a TPE that a. could absorb the players and b. wasn't going to be used so the Warriors paid us cash to help them make the deal.
He wanted DLo so bad but knew he didn’t have the juice needed for DLo so he decided to help and watch while GSW consummated the deal with DLo right in front of him.
-
KATMANDUDE
- Posts: 313
- Joined: Mon May 06, 2019 11:35 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
I've seen a lot of angst among Rubes. Some, in a snit, are saying they shouldn't even have tried. That Gentlemen & Ladies is the thinking of a loser.
Well, The Wolves FO tried, but Warriors had Durant to deal, Wolves had Wiggins, Teague & Dieng. Guess who wins 100%.
"It is Better To Have Loved & Lost ... Than Never To Have Loved At All."
Well, The Wolves FO tried, but Warriors had Durant to deal, Wolves had Wiggins, Teague & Dieng. Guess who wins 100%.
"It is Better To Have Loved & Lost ... Than Never To Have Loved At All."
- irishman89
- Posts: 5647
- Joined: Fri Sep 15, 2017 3:34 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
I feel like Golden State ended up wearing a 27 million dollar ball gag and they can enjoy that for the next 4 years.jodaman01 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 8:10 amSo Rosas turned the Wolves into GSW’s cuckold.mlhouse wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 9:03 pmI finally figured out why the Wolves were included in the sign and trade, and why Golden St. needed a 3rd party to facilitate the trade.OliverMiller wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 8:41 pm
But again, Marc Stein is claiming that the Warriors will trade him at some point. So why pick a place that you know will trade you?
By doing a sign and trade Golden St. was "hard capped" meanign they could not go above the Apron in any transaction. So, they needed a 3rd Party to facilitate the trade by absorbing all of the excess filler contracts coming back to them from Brooklyn. Minnesota had a TPE that a. could absorb the players and b. wasn't going to be used so the Warriors paid us cash to help them make the deal.![]()
![]()
He wanted DLo so bad but knew he didn’t have the juice needed for DLo so he decided to help and watch while GSW consummated the deal with DLo right in front of him.
![]()
-
jodaman01
- #1 Tom Thibodeau Fan
- Posts: 8870
- Joined: Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:06 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
DLo dominated GSW, Rosas/Wolves got stuck with clean up duty/dootie.irishman89 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 8:33 amI feel like Golden State ended up wearing a 27 million dollar ball gag and they can enjoy that for the next 4 years.jodaman01 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 8:10 amSo Rosas turned the Wolves into GSW’s cuckold.mlhouse wrote: ↑Mon Jul 01, 2019 9:03 pm
I finally figured out why the Wolves were included in the sign and trade, and why Golden St. needed a 3rd party to facilitate the trade.
By doing a sign and trade Golden St. was "hard capped" meanign they could not go above the Apron in any transaction. So, they needed a 3rd Party to facilitate the trade by absorbing all of the excess filler contracts coming back to them from Brooklyn. Minnesota had a TPE that a. could absorb the players and b. wasn't going to be used so the Warriors paid us cash to help them make the deal.![]()
![]()
He wanted DLo so bad but knew he didn’t have the juice needed for DLo so he decided to help and watch while GSW consummated the deal with DLo right in front of him.
![]()
- kilkenny
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:53 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Curious on the rule for trades here. DLo can be traded by the Warriors up until Noon est on July 6th? After that it's 3 months?
- T_J
- Posts: 9720
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:53 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Isn't it that technically they can still just alter the original trades? Then those lock in the 6th followed by the 3 month waiting period?
-
HeHateMe
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 18510
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Dec 15th once the deal is official. Until it's official, you could potentially just add another team to the deal somehow but what's Golden State taking back from MN besides stuff we don't want to give up?
- shuttlesworth
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:12 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Technically D-Lo is still on the Nets because he can't be officially traded to GSW until July 6th. So the Warriors can "trade" him again before then in that they could restructure his trade from the Nets as a three-team deal. But that's very unlikely to happen: it would require D-Lo himself changing his mind about joining the Warriors: because he hasn't yet signed there, he effectively has veto power over any "trade" the Warriors want to do.
I wouldn't 100% rule it out, because over the past few days there have been many rumors that the Warriors will trade D-Lo at the first available opportunity, and that they just signed him to get an asset for Durant. And maybe D-Lo will realize that he's essentially signing up to play for the Warriors for 3 months to a year and then some other team over which he has no control for the remainder of his contract. Maybe he'll decide that he'd rather play for MN or the Lakers, where he knows he has a long-term role. And again, because he hasn't officially signed yet, he has time to change his mind. But that's what it would take.
I wouldn't 100% rule it out, because over the past few days there have been many rumors that the Warriors will trade D-Lo at the first available opportunity, and that they just signed him to get an asset for Durant. And maybe D-Lo will realize that he's essentially signing up to play for the Warriors for 3 months to a year and then some other team over which he has no control for the remainder of his contract. Maybe he'll decide that he'd rather play for MN or the Lakers, where he knows he has a long-term role. And again, because he hasn't officially signed yet, he has time to change his mind. But that's what it would take.
-
Oriole81
- Posts: 38110
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
couldn't we send Wiggins + the expirings for Russell? Before anyone says "why would GS want Russell" I will pre-emptively state here "why would they want Russell in the first place?" It's clear nobody knows at this point what GS is thinking or what they value, so who knows if they could be interested in Wiggins.
could it work though?
2025 Froob NBA Draft
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
-
HeHateMe
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 18510
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Marc Stein was the one who went on the Dan Patrick show and said they'll trade him eventually, he's an asset. Stein was also the one feeding the info about Russell meeting with Minnesota on Sunday. Perhaps he's getting fed some stuff from the MN side...shuttlesworth wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:37 am Technically D-Lo is still on the Nets because he can't be officially traded to GSW until July 6th. So the Warriors can "trade" him again before then in that they could restructure his trade from the Nets as a three-team deal. But that's very unlikely to happen: it would require D-Lo himself changing his mind about joining the Warriors: because he hasn't yet signed there, he effectively has veto power over any "trade" the Warriors want to do.
I wouldn't 100% rule it out, because over the past few days there have been many rumors that the Warriors will trade D-Lo at the first available opportunity, and that they just signed him to get an asset for Durant. And maybe D-Lo will realize that he's essentially signing up to play for the Warriors for 3 months to a year and then some other team over which he has no control for the remainder of his contract. Maybe he'll decide that he'd rather play for MN or the Lakers, where he knows he has a long-term role. And again, because he hasn't officially signed yet, he has time to change his mind. But that's what it would take.
-
HeHateMe
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 18510
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Wiggins makes the same money as Russell next year now. Not sure what type of deal you're laying out..Oriole81 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:39 amcouldn't we send Wiggins + the expirings for Russell? Before anyone says "why would GS want Russell" I will pre-emptively state here "why would they want Russell in the first place?" It's clear nobody knows at this point what GS is thinking or what they value, so who knows if they could be interested in Wiggins.
could it work though?
Also:
-
Oriole81
- Posts: 38110
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2018 4:48 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
or whatever it would take from a salary matching standpoint.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:43 amWiggins makes the same money as Russell next year now. Not sure what type of deal you're laying out..Oriole81 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:39 amcouldn't we send Wiggins + the expirings for Russell? Before anyone says "why would GS want Russell" I will pre-emptively state here "why would they want Russell in the first place?" It's clear nobody knows at this point what GS is thinking or what they value, so who knows if they could be interested in Wiggins.
could it work though?
Also:
but there's just so much conflicting info going on now about if he can or can't that I don't know who to trust, so that's why I just threw that out there.
2025 Froob NBA Draft
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
Billups, Lillard, Moncrief
Wade, Harden, Petrovic
Bird, George, Marion
Nowitzki, Barkley, Anthony
Russell, A Sabonis, Parish
- kilkenny
- Posts: 9178
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:53 am
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Yeah, but they're saying the sign and trade doesn't take effect until July 6th. So things can be changed.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:43 amWiggins makes the same money as Russell next year now. Not sure what type of deal you're laying out..Oriole81 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:39 amcouldn't we send Wiggins + the expirings for Russell? Before anyone says "why would GS want Russell" I will pre-emptively state here "why would they want Russell in the first place?" It's clear nobody knows at this point what GS is thinking or what they value, so who knows if they could be interested in Wiggins.
could it work though?
Also:
- minnemike
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 14181
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2017 8:10 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
-
HeHateMe
- KFAN Rube Chat Hall of Fame Member
- Posts: 18510
- Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2017 1:38 pm
Re: Wolves in on D'Angelo Russell?
Yes but again, that requires Golden State to get a better deal. Where is that coming from?kilkenny wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:51 amYeah, but they're saying the sign and trade doesn't take effect until July 6th. So things can be changed.HeHateMe wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:43 amWiggins makes the same money as Russell next year now. Not sure what type of deal you're laying out..Oriole81 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 02, 2019 9:39 am
couldn't we send Wiggins + the expirings for Russell? Before anyone says "why would GS want Russell" I will pre-emptively state here "why would they want Russell in the first place?" It's clear nobody knows at this point what GS is thinking or what they value, so who knows if they could be interested in Wiggins.
could it work though?
Also:







